<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Raw Materials Econ &#187; Entrepreneur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/category/entrepreneur/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rawmaterialsecon.com</link>
	<description>Saving Lives One Idea At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stochastic Implications</title>
		<link>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/989/stochastic-implications.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=stochastic-implications</link>
		<comments>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/989/stochastic-implications.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Greathouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawmaterialsecon.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The research behind a follow up to last month&#8217;s Money post grew past expectations. The history of the U.S. since 1934 involves complex and complicated financial creativity that appears challenging to break down in to understandable units. I will persevere. IMHO, this history represents a significant force bearing upon our society. Also, a follow up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1003" title="dice" src="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dice.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="200" /></p>
<p>The research behind a follow up to last month&#8217;s <a title="money" href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/922/money.html" target="_self">Money</a> post grew past expectations. The history of the U.S. since 1934 involves complex and complicated <em>financial creativity</em> that appears challenging to break down in to understandable units.</p>
<p><strong>I will persevere. IMHO</strong>, this history represents a significant force bearing upon our society.</p>
<p>Also, a follow up to <a title="First Four Steps To An Online Business" href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/entrepreneur/613/first-4-steps-to-an-online-business.html" target="_self">First Four Steps To An Online Business</a> is in the works. A hint: it all revolves around the capacity to produce content.</p>
<p>But recently, two revelations seem to have hit me in the head simultaneously. They both involve revealing <strong>limits of control</strong> and <strong>expanded freedom</strong>.</p>
<p>First, meditation upon the idea that maybe the universe we live in proceeds as a <a title="stochastic process" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_process" target="_self"><strong>stochastic process</strong></a>, as opposed to a deterministic one, presents <strong>new understandings of the universe</strong> to me. For a moment, think about how a non-deterministic universe would work.</p>
<p>If one could no longer say, for example, that <em>action &#8220;A&#8221;</em> always caused <em>consequence &#8220;C&#8221;</em>, then how would things happen? Well, for a clue, <strong>stochastic processes</strong> are central to <a title="probability theory" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_theory" target="_self"><strong>probability theory</strong></a>.</p>
<p>So, you may be able to affect the <strong>probable outcomes</strong> of a specific situation but not absolutely determine them. You may be able to <strong>shift the odds</strong> and make <em>one thing or another</em> <strong>more or less likely</strong> but never be assured of a <em>&#8220;sure thing&#8221;</em>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Sound familiar?</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<ol>
<li><strong><em>Nothing</em></strong> for <strong><em>certain</em></strong>,</li>
<li><strong><em>everything</em></strong> ultimately unknown and in a universe proceeding as a stochastic process,</li>
<li><strong><em>unknowable</em></strong>.</li>
</ol>
<p>How about all the plans of mice and men?</p>
<p>All of a sudden, a <strong>world of anomalous events</strong> may come out of the closet. And this says nothing about <a title="magical thinking" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking" target="_self"><strong>magical thinking</strong></a>.</p>
<p>Correlation was never accepted as causation by <strong>dogmatically deterministic</strong> mainstream science. But now the entire idea of causation seems <em>out the window</em>.</p>
<p>Activities once condescendingly dismissed as <strong>magical thinking</strong> have been proven to have a noticeable, but difficult to quantify, affect on situations. <strong>Mental causation</strong> proves to be a tough sell but <strong>mental influence</strong> appears to be another issue all together.</p>
<p>Remember, in a <strong>stochastic process</strong> causation seems <em>out the window</em>. <strong>Mental causation</strong> becomes a non-issue, misdirection and an example of the illogical <a title="straw man fallacy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man" target="_self">straw man fallacy</a>.</p>
<p>In a <strong>stochastic process</strong> there could <strong>never be blame</strong>. Nothing and no body could ever be found <em>at fault</em>.</p>
<p>Sure, someone could <strong>influence</strong> an environment <strong>modifying probabilities</strong> to favor certain outcomes, <em>even pull the trigger themselves</em>, yet <strong><em>still not be the cause</em></strong> of any specific outcome.</p>
<p><strong><em>How would it change your life</em></strong> if you understood beyond a shadow of a doubt that everything, even your next breath and the very next beat of your heart, was no more certain than the results of a roll of the dice? Well, needless to say, the <strong><em>theological implications alone</em></strong> are staggering.</p>
<p>I could go on and on about where this particular revelation has taken my thoughts but I need to mention the <strong>second revelation</strong>. It concerns the <strong>psychological dimension</strong> and once again challenges the <strong>limits of control</strong> with the potential for <strong>expanded freedom</strong>.</p>
<p>I will get around to writing something about that, too, maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/989/stochastic-implications.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First 4 Steps To An Online Business</title>
		<link>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/entrepreneur/613/first-4-steps-to-an-online-business.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=first-4-steps-to-an-online-business</link>
		<comments>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/entrepreneur/613/first-4-steps-to-an-online-business.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Greathouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Godwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trevor Reznik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yaro Starak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawmaterialsecon.com/?p=613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Significantly,  we currently see 4 dominant methods to enjoy Internet Traffic. 1. Pay for advertising using AdWords, Pay-Per-Click advertising, banners or]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://whatconsumesme.com"><img class="size-full wp-image-409 aligncenter" title="bhappyinbusiness600" src="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bhappyinbusiness600.png" alt="image by Bud Caddell" width="600" height="600" /></a></p>
<p>Recently, a woman expressed a concern to me that she had &#8220;<strong><em>nothing going</em></strong>&#8221; and needed to rely on another person. She felt <strong>insecure to the extent she was dependent</strong> and asked me what I thought she could do.</p>
<p>The resources for a brick and mortar business just were not available and she knew enough about the <strong>online world</strong> to think she could get &#8220;<strong><em>something going</em></strong>&#8221; online. Undecided about specific niches in her broad general areas of interest, she &#8220;<strong><em>got going</em></strong>&#8221; by creating an online persona.</p>
<blockquote><p>Her first 4 Steps were:</p>
<ol>
<li>Purchase a domain name and blog hosting and set up an email address for the persona</li>
<li>Use the persona email address to obtain a Google user-name and password for the persona</li>
<li>Use the Google account to create a YouTube account for the persona</li>
<li>Create a Twitter account for the persona</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>This seems like the essential groundwork required to begin <strong>vblogging</strong> or <strong>video blogging</strong>. The technical requirements appear minimal, especially regarding media production with the technology getting simpler every year.</p>
<p>Producing a stream of content remains one absolute requirement. This one requirement shows up everywhere online.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Do not blog if you are not a writer.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Do not vblog if you are not a videographer.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you can get past the <strong>2 month hump</strong>, then you have the <strong>6 month hump</strong> and the <strong>2 year hump</strong>. <strong><em>You get past the humps by being productive.</em></strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;">The possibility of <a title="Jumping The Shark" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark" target="_self"><strong>Jumping The Shark</strong></a> looms as a constant threat.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Being productive may include any activity that produces more value than went into it. Some people, for example, <strong>make money online by selling artisan food products</strong>.</p>
<p>The next step involves understanding and working with <strong>Key Words</strong>. Since I feel the topic of <strong>Key Words</strong> deserves its own article, I&#8217;ll leave that for later.</p>
<blockquote><p>Significantly,  we currently see <strong>4 dominant methods</strong> to enjoy <strong>Internet Traffic</strong>.</p>
<ol>
<li>Pay for advertising using <strong>AdWords</strong>, <strong>Pay-Per-Click advertising</strong>, <strong>banners</strong> or any other method that involves you paying for traffic before you sell anything.</li>
<li><strong>Affiliates</strong> and <strong>Joint Venture Partners</strong> send you their traffic and their payment comes from a percentage of the purchasing customers they send.</li>
<li><strong>Organic Search Engine Traffic</strong>, notably from <strong>Google</strong> these days.</li>
<li>Leveraging <strong>Social Media</strong> and <strong>Social Bookmarking</strong> sites.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>In my mind, their relative desirability ranks in reverse order to my listing. One could start with <strong>Method 4</strong> and never need to try anything else.</p>
<p>If you do your part with being productive, <strong>Method 3</strong> should take off before <strong>Method 4</strong> peaks. These two methods will give you the proof needed to interest useful <strong>Affiliates and Joint Venture Partners</strong>.</p>
<p>Until you can prove your production sells, useful <strong>Affiliates and Joint Venture Partners</strong> will not be interested. Once you prove you have a winner, <strong>Method 2</strong> can increase your income dramatically.</p>
<p>If your product successfully sells online, then <strong>Affiliates and Joint Venture Partners</strong> will be interested. Paying for advertising may never become necessary.</p>
<p>With the above <strong>4 Steps</strong> in place, you will be in the position to publish content online. Your content will create a following.</p>
<p>Once you have a following you will be <strong>ready for the next step</strong>s and that will take another post.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>In the mean time</em></strong><br />
check out <a title="cfw+rtb=$" href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/466/cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money.html" target="_self">my article</a> about:</p>
<ul>
<li>Mike Masnick</li>
<li>Seth Godwin</li>
<li>Trevor Reznik</li>
</ul>
<p>and the articles by <a title="Yarrow Starak" href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/tag/yaro-starak" target="_self">Yaro Starak</a></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Leave your questions in the comments</strong> and I will answer them there or in a new post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/entrepreneur/613/first-4-steps-to-an-online-business.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run Faster Than The Slowest Camper</title>
		<link>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/575/run-faster-than-the-slowest-camper.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=run-faster-than-the-slowest-camper</link>
		<comments>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/575/run-faster-than-the-slowest-camper.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Greathouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawmaterialsecon.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bear is out of the woods and the bull is running for cover. Forget about out running the bear, that is never going to happen. I will tell you why in a second. All you really need to do is run faster than the slowest camper. 96 years ago, December 23, Woodrow Wilson used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/alanvernon/3199945579/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-596" title="Alan Vernon" src="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Alan-Vernon.jpg" alt="Alan Vernon" width="600" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>The <strong>bear</strong> is out of the woods and the <strong>bull</strong> is running for cover. <strong>Forget about out running the bear, <em>that is never going to happen</em>. </strong>I will tell you why in a second.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">All you really need to do is run faster than the slowest camper.</h3>
<p>96 years ago, December 23, <strong>Woodrow Wilson</strong> used four gold pens to sign the <strong>Federal Reserve Act</strong> into law. This act is arguably the <strong>most destructive and harmful law</strong> enacted by a <strong>United States President</strong> up to that time.</p>
<p>The <strong>Federal Reserve Act</strong> allowed the <strong>inflationary bubbles</strong> that created the <strong>snowball of debt</strong> that currently engulfs us today. <a title="debasing money with inflation" href="http://garyscommonsense.blogspot.com/2008/04/debasing-dollar.html" target="_self">Nothing is at all mysterious about inflation</a>;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>inflation is government intervention pure and simple.</strong></p>
<p>This proves the lie of <strong>the myth that regulators actually regulate</strong> rather than serve the interests of <strong>corporate beneficiaries</strong>. <a title="debasing money" href="http://mises.org/story/3050" target="_self">Debasing money</a> is an old trick of governments going back <em>at least as far as Biblical times</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p><sup id="en-KJV-1436">15</sup>And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-1437">16</sup>And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-1438">17</sup>And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-1439">18</sup>When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands:</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-1440">19</sup>Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-1441">20</sup>And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh&#8217;s.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-1442">21</sup>And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof.<br />
Genesis 47</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>What happened in Egypt</strong> is that the <strong>grain harvest</strong> was <strong>deposited</strong> into the <strong>secure government storage facility</strong>. The government then <strong>issued script</strong> (money) against the grain reserves.</p>
<p>When the <strong>government wanted to spend more than they could back up</strong> with grain reserves, they just went ahead and <strong>printed up more script</strong> anyway <strong>betting on ever increasing harvests</strong> to make the script good. Of course, with crop failures not only was the <strong>inflated script no good</strong>, in that it never had backing, but the <strong>original script could not be redeemed</strong> for grain either because there was none.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Fiscal policy cannot stimulate the economy.<br />
The government has no money of its own.<br />
It has only the power to tax and spend the money of others.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Financial collapse</strong> and <strong>food collapse</strong> have proven to be the consistent downfall of empires throughout human history. I write about the food collapse a little bit further down but first I want to touch upon the evidence of the <strong>advanced fear the government exhibits toward the governed</strong>.</p>
<p>Of course, since <strong>war has been declared upon United States citizens</strong> with the <strong>War On Drugs</strong> that allows the United States government to set <strong>new international records in the both the percentage of the population and total numbers of citizens</strong> that have been <strong><em>sent to prison by their own government</em></strong>.</p>
<p>The few shreds of the <strong>Bill of Rights</strong> remaining after the <strong>War On Drugs</strong> have now been completely obliterated by the subsequent <strong>War On Terrorism</strong>. The government appears so on edge that <strong>any excuse seems provocation enough</strong> to justify <a title="Homeland Security" href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20091230/0122067544.shtml" target="_self"><strong>A Visit And Subpoena From Homeland Security</strong></a>.</p>
<p>The <strong>U.S. government fears and wages war upon</strong><strong> the U.S. governed</strong> for reasons similar to why the <strong>Israeli government fears and wages war upon the Palestinians</strong>. Neither government would expect anyone to sit still for the wholesale fraud and abuse they dish out for very long.</p>
<p>They wish to <strong>avoid judgment and the consequences of their actions</strong>, <em>also spelled out in <strong>the Bible</strong></em>.</p>
<blockquote><p><sup id="en-KJV-30356">1</sup>Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-30357">2</sup>Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth eaten.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-30358">3</sup>Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-30359">4</sup>Behold, the hire of the laborers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabbath.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-30360">5</sup>Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter.</p>
<p><sup id="en-KJV-30361">6</sup>Ye have condemned and killed the just; and he doth not resist you.<br />
James 5</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>When the wealthy cheat farmers out of what the farmer is due the financial system tanks regardless of the unjust wars the wealthy wage.</strong></p>
<p>This <strong><em>truth from Biblical times</em></strong> held up as a key point concerning the <strong>Fall of the Roman Empire</strong> and still holds true today. Truth seems to endure even if empires do not.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Closing the 'Collapse Gap': the USSR was better prepared for collapse than the US by Dmitry Orlov" href="http://www.energybulletin.net/node/23259" target="_self"><strong>Closing the &#8216;Collapse Gap&#8217;:<br />
the USSR was better prepared for collapse than the US</strong></a></p>
<p>Despite appearances, we are <strong>not merely revisiting old mistakes</strong>. Our very way of life has been transformed into <strong>dependency upon an unsustainable system</strong> now running out of resources.</p>
<p>Die-off is a bottom-up phenomena affecting the <strong>lowest rungs of the human socioeconomic ladder first</strong>. This is already happening at a scale that is <strong>increasingly impossible to ignore</strong>.</p>
<p>Spiritual Leaders, scientists, climatologists, anthropologists and leading researchers unsuccessfully try to convince humanity that <strong>our self-destructive path is the true root cause of the collapse</strong>.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Prepare now.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Prepare now</strong> by becoming productive <strong>in your own name</strong>. <strong>Prepare now</strong> by <strong><em>connecting with people</em></strong> who <strong>appreciate your products</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Those who cannot connect</strong> with a personal fan base will be <strong>without the opportunity to sell </strong>their products directly. Lacking that opportunity, the only recourse will be <strong>self-reliance</strong> and <strong>self-sufficiency</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>A lonely path at best.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/575/run-faster-than-the-slowest-camper.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CwF plus RtB equals Serious Money</title>
		<link>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/466/cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money</link>
		<comments>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/466/cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Greathouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliot Van Buskirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Godwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trevor Reznik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawmaterialsecon.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connect with Fans and give them a Reason to Buy to Make Serious Money - The Essence Of Marketing Reduced To A Simple Formula. Globalization and the Internet mean freedom from monopoly controlled markets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/466/cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money.html"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">CwF + RtB = $$$$</h2>
<p><span>This video spells out the somewhat cryptic title as meaning </span><strong><em>Connect with Fans and give them a Reason to Buy to Make Serious Money</em></strong> through an explanation with examples by <span><strong>Mike Masnick</strong>. </span>A suitable subtitle might be <strong><em>The Essence Of Marketing Reduced To A Simple Formula</em></strong>.</p>
<p>It really doesn’t get any more straightforward than this. While the formula tells you what to do, <strong>it does not tell you how to do it</strong>.</p>
<p>The examples <strong>Mike Masnick</strong> gives here, and in an earlier video where he used <strong>Trevor Reznik</strong> of <strong><em>Nine Inch Nails</em></strong> fame as an example, indicates that <strong>giving away valuable free stuff </strong>is one way how to do it. This is the same advice widely offered for Internet marketing in general.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/466/cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money.html"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p><strong>NARM</strong> (the National Association of Recording Merchandisers) <strong>2009 Keynote Interview</strong> presents <strong>Eliot Van Buskirk</strong> (WIRED) interviewing <strong> Ian Rogers</strong> (<a title="Top Spin Media" href="http://topspinmedia.com/" target="_self">Topspin Media</a>). A long time innovator in the online media scene, he feels that real progress is most likely on the <strong>creative side</strong> rather than on the consumer side and hence his move from <strong>Yahoo</strong> to <strong>Topspin</strong>.</p>
<p><a title="Seth Godwin Permission Marketing" href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2008/01/permission-mark.html" target="_self">Seth Godwin</a> coined the phrase <strong>Permission Marketing</strong> over 10 years ago. It is just one more attempt to <strong><em>explain something that should never require explaining</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Intentional system controls implemented by <strong>monopolies preserve artificial scarcity</strong>. Monopolies maintain their control in part by <strong>paying politicians to legislate barriers to entry into monopolized industries</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Globalization and the Internet</strong> make it much more difficult, if not impossible, to maintain some monopolies. With this <strong>freedom from monopoly controlled markets</strong>, consumers can choose who to give their money to.</p>
<p>Without monopolies<strong> everything in the market eventually becomes a commodity</strong> distinguished only by <strong>private label branding</strong>. The private label brands survive only by becoming <strong>recognized and trusted by consumers</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Only when private label brands cannot be trusted</strong> do consumers default to making <strong>buying decisions based on the lowest price</strong>. Any place you go you will find many people who would prefer to give their business to someone they know and trust <strong>even if that means paying more</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>People only know and trust their friends</strong>. If you want loyal customers who will buy your offerings time after time, even if they are more expensive, then you <strong>need to make them your friends</strong>.</p>
<p>Of course, <strong><em>because they are your friends</em></strong>, you will want to offer <strong>value added</strong> products. You will see more <strong>limited and signed editions</strong>, lots of additional posters, patches and such, as well as the unique opportunities to spend <strong>more time with the artists</strong>.</p>
<p>In industries with low barriers to entry, such as <strong>music and marketing</strong>, financial survival depends upon <strong>becoming friends with potential customers before you ask them for money</strong>. No one views an attempt to sell them something first as an invitation to friendship.</p>
<p>Since <strong>making friends</strong> seems to have become a lost art, especially in the United States, here is <strong>the number one way to make someone your friend</strong>. The number one way to make someone your friend is to <strong>give them something they value for free</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Do someone a favor</strong>, that is, help them out or solve a problem <strong>without setting a price and demanding payment</strong>. This is how people socialized for thousands of years but recently more and more of <strong>these social norms have been monetized</strong>.</p>
<p>The <strong>monetization of social norms</strong>, pricing and demanding payment for what was once freely shared, represents <strong>theft from the common wealth of all people</strong>. This <strong>theft</strong> from the common wealth of all people <strong>started over 10,000 years ago</strong> and has grown by fits and starts ever since.</p>
<p>Recently this practice of theft from the common wealth of all people <strong>through privatization</strong> has accelerated, especially in the <strong>United States</strong>. I can identify this dysfunctional practice as <strong>sociopathic at best</strong> but that serves little purpose now that it has permeated nearly every facet of modern life including <strong>all areas of public service</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Thoughtful feeling people </strong>feel repelled by this nearly ubiquitous trend, as well they should. Thoughtful feeling people instinctually <strong>avoid giving money to artificial monopolies </strong>by seeking out friends who can meet their needs, often <strong>even if their needs are more poorly met.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Celebrity status</strong> merely indicates that someone has <strong>more friends than they can personally directly respond to</strong>. It has become customary to call these friends, <strong><em>fans</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, <strong>every fan feels a personal connection to the celebrity</strong>. This feeling is the same as what someone <strong>feels for a friend</strong>, for someone who has <strong>helped them out</strong> far beyond any compensation that may have been offered.</p>
<p>The perceived need to obtain <strong>financial compensation</strong> for every act of aid and human kindness has become the single <strong>greatest impediment to business growth</strong>. <strong>Monopolies</strong> may be in the position to demand such payment anyway but they <strong>are not making friends</strong> and no one feels any trust or loyalty towards them.</p>
<p>So unless you run a monopoly, <strong><em>start making friends</em></strong> if you want your business to survive and prosper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/466/cwf-plus-rtb-equals-serious-money.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing Beats Selling</title>
		<link>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/305/marketing-beats-selling.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=marketing-beats-selling</link>
		<comments>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/305/marketing-beats-selling.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Greathouse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawmaterialsecon.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fixed belief in our own correctness, self-righteousness in other words, inevitably leads to both our unhappiness and the unhappiness of others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_337" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img class="size-full wp-image-337" title="curmudgeon" src="http://rawmaterialsecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/curmudgeon.jpg" alt="curmudgeon" width="600" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">FNORD</p></div>
<p><strong>My dad</strong>, 84 years old and counting, <strong>lifelong salesman</strong>, sales manager, sales trainer and independent representative <strong>speaks with open disdain about marketers</strong>. Yet, when you listen to him talk about his <strong>sales process</strong> it becomes clear that he takes a <strong>straight up marketing approach</strong>.</p>
<p>The first thing he does as a <strong><em>&#8220;salesman&#8221;</em></strong> is to identify <strong>companies ready to purchase</strong> in commercial volumes. Among marketers this is known as <strong>locating a market</strong>.</p>
<p>Next he <strong>connects with a decision maker</strong> and during the interview clarifies what <strong>problems</strong> they have. Marketers often use polls and questionnaires to discover a market&#8217;s <strong>needs, wants and desires</strong>.</p>
<p>Then, my dad <strong>works with one of the companies he represents</strong>, or even locates a company he has never represented before, to<strong> come up with a solution</strong>. Marketers follow the same process and if the solution is an information product either <strong>hires an expert, obtains the rights or creates the product themselves</strong>.</p>
<p>Finally, he goes back to the prospect company with the <strong>solution in hand</strong> complete with pricing and delivery information. <strong>It also works exactly this way for marketers.</strong></p>
<p>When someone believes they have come up with what <strong>they perceive someone else needs</strong>, without their input or guidance, they then must <strong>attempt to sell</strong> it to them in order to regain their investment, personal  power and self esteem. <strong>Whenever you start with a product before you have a market you are faced with a sales proposition.</strong></p>
<p>This is why <strong>marketing may be approached as a science</strong> but all <strong>sales initiatives originate in ideologies</strong>. I&#8217;ve lost count of how many people have approached me with <strong>their absolute need to sell</strong> something they just dreamed up or discovered in a bargain bin somewhere.</p>
<p><strong>Science</strong> observes the natural world and creates <strong>mind maps</strong> to make sense of it. These scientific ideas never achieve closure and remain open to <strong>modification and obsolescence</strong>.</p>
<p>We create <strong>ideologies</strong> as <strong>mind</strong><strong> maps</strong> to which the natural world is abused into conforming. These <strong>ideologies</strong> arrive as a package deal usually complete with a supportive <strong>all-encompassing world view</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>The map is not the terrain.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Science</strong> knows the history of their <strong>mind</strong><strong> maps</strong> and constantly compares them to the natural world so to modify the <strong>mind</strong><strong> maps</strong> and increase their accuracy. <strong>Ideology</strong> acts as if their <strong>mind</strong><strong> maps</strong> are the terrain while becoming proactive in manipulating the natural world to conform to the <strong>mind</strong><strong> maps</strong>.</p>
<p>It speaks to the <strong>power of ideologies</strong> that this distinction between marketing and sales often seems to be the <strong>biggest conceptual challenge</strong> limiting my students. Indeed, they often insist upon <strong>just being delivered an ideology</strong> while ironically demanding that it accurately correspond to the natural world.</p>
<p>Offered the <strong>appearance of free choice</strong>, people seem to <strong>prefer ideologies</strong> which inevitably conflict with the natural world <strong>over science</strong> that never arrives at closure and <strong>always seems as work in progress</strong>. Ironically, successful ideologies often masquerade as science while science then comes under attack as ideology.</p>
<p><strong>The weakness of science</strong> is the willingness to consider alternative solutions to real problems. In other words, <strong>the reluctance to become an ideology</strong> also becomes the weakness of science.</p>
<p><strong>The strength of ideology</strong> is the high acceptance it finds for the quick and simple answers it provides to real world problems. Unfortunately, <strong><em>the answers are always wrong</em></strong>, regardless of first impressions or our desires for closure.</p>
<p><strong>This problem manifests when a vendor becomes a consumer.</strong> Their consumer training to only accept the quick and easy, cheap and simple, silver bullet one-shot solution betrays them when they wish to provide products and services to consumers.</p>
<p>While <strong>consumers feel justified in thinking it is all about them</strong> this feeding of the ego <strong>sets up business people for failure </strong>if they cannot make the adjustment to the other side of the coin. This failure to adjust results in a <strong><em>selling ideology</em></strong>.</p>
<p>While a person&#8217;s ideas may be interesting and welcome <strong>as long as they are a consumer</strong>, once they become a vendor of products and services their ideas become irrelevant. <strong>The world is full of great ideas that few care about</strong>.</p>
<p>This <strong>ego driven need</strong> to see personal ideas accepted by other people, through deception, fraud and the threat of harm if need be, meets the <strong>definition of ideology</strong>. This also describes the underlying methodologies of many <strong>mainstream selling techniques</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Ideology and selling lack resilience.</strong></p>
<p>The narrow point of view generated by a <strong>consumer perspective</strong> holds no more attractiveness to others than any other <strong>inflexible ideological opinion</strong>. This leads to the <strong>failures of businesses and the collapse of empires</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Resilience</strong> relies upon both the <strong>willingness to competently observe reality</strong> regardless of what we wish to see and the <strong>ability to modify activities</strong> accordingly regardless of how habitualized we may have become to them. <strong>A fixed belief</strong> in our own correctness, self-righteousness in other words, inevitably leads to both <strong>our unhappiness and the unhappiness of others</strong>.</p>
<p>That is why <strong>I do not accept students as clients</strong> who insist they have invented the <strong>next best thing</strong>, whether it be a business service, a physical device or social idea. <strong>They are always wrong and doomed to failure</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>If you wish to make money</strong>, online or face-to-face, it is enough to start with that desire. When you bring your own preconceptions along <strong>you limit your resilience</strong> according to the <strong>strength of your beliefs</strong>.</p>
<p>Accordingly, <strong>my first question to you</strong> then is not concerning your product but concerning <strong>the market you wish to join</strong>. Identify a market first and <strong>the market will identify a successful product </strong>for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rawmaterialsecon.com/economics/305/marketing-beats-selling.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
