Marijuana Parity Pricing

FNORD
Agricultural producers, under economic attack for generations in the United States, need to receive parity pricing for their produce in order to begin another round of the economic cycle without debt. Forcing agricultural producers into debt at the beginning of the economic cycle impoverishes everyone except the financial services industry parasites who profit at everyone else’s expense.
Marijuana, cannabis, hemp or whatever you call it may well be the last agricultural crop grown in the United States that is capable of providing enough income to be worthwhile growing. Profitable agriculture only appears possible outside of a legal system created to benefit a pathological elite, by definition an activity pursued only by outlaws.
This fact alone proves the lie to the political theater misrepresenting open markets and free trade. The only open markets and free trade possible today operates outside of the licensing, regulation and taxation of our pathocracy.
The free and independent culture surrounding marijuana agriculture, even as harassed and persecuted as it is, may be one of the last widespread autonomous agricultural activities available to Americans. Today parity pricing only exists outside of the law.
While many now seek to end the illogical criminalization of this most useful of all plants it seems few wish to look with open eyes at the likely outcome of their success. The price all will pay to end the justified fear of taking a few tokes will be the end of all profitable agriculture.
The growing plea for outrageous taxation levels on every step of bringing marijuana to a legalized market will end the financial incentive to grow it. We are witnessing widespread voluntary servitude for the illusionary benefit of reduced persecution.
Notice I said “reduced persecution” and not the end of persecution. Perhaps people have grown so used to their enslavement within the panopticon that they have grown numb to how modern society has become penal and coercive in nature.
Few seem to realize that licensing, regulation and taxation requires the increased intrusion of an increasingly militant and corrupt government in personal private affairs. The idea that the decriminalization of marijuana will somehow stop the police from “crawling up your ass” is far from realistic.
As it stands, only the complete collapse of our pathocracy will allow the fair pricing of agricultural products. Perhaps then people will learn to manage money as a common resource and public utility rather than the private monopoly money is today.
With decriminalization, marijuana cultivation will eventually come under the control of government subsidized agribusiness as all other commercial crops already have. The one commercial crop still supporting many rural communities will cease to be profitable.
This all comes from confusing the symptoms of unjust persecution with the cause of unjust persecution. The entire population of marijuana decriminalization activists have been tricked into petitioning their oppressors for more oppression.
The oppressors desired this outcome and manipulated events so that people will come to them of their own free will begging for more laws, more regulations, more licensing requirements and more taxes. The people they have tricked now look only to the small areas their attention has been directed to and are not aware of the greater game at play.
By terrorizing marijuana enthusiasts with militarized domestic law enforcement, those who created, empowered and armed marijuana eradication teams in the first place now weigh the various options for profit and control the marijuana enthusiasts themselves propose. Once a common cause among most who opposed our pathocracy, marijuana decriminalization has become a niche issue apart from greater issues of social injustice.
Why not advocate the return to parity for all agriculture products? This would only return our entire economy to profitability and limit the power of the central banks.
Why accept any measure of government control over what we choose to put in our bodies at all? This would only free communities of people from the onerous violent intrusion of domestic armed forces.
How can anyone believe that with decriminalization of marijuana under the hand of oppression nothing else will change? Transferring the wealth of original production from an underground economy to our pathocracy will only strengthen those who have oppressed and terrorized us while weakening those who resisted them.
We will not have more freedom. We will have less freedom.
The rich will become richer and the poor will become poorer as the door closes upon the last opportunity to sell an agricultural product at parity. After all of this I can only hope that at least you will still be able to get high from smoking it.
But do not count on it.
What do you think?
Resilience Economics
Useful Resilience Economics needs more than theoretical responses to scenario sketches. Thought experiments will not be enough to get you moving towards a more secure economic status today.
The current economic collapse appears unique within the history of economic collapses because we have lost our inherent safety net that traditionally cushioned downturns. The very same so-called “Masters of The Universe” who drove the current economy into the wall have already cannibalized our ability to weather failure gracefully especially in the United States and Europe.
The decades of economic attacks upon family farms leave us vulnerable to a very hard landing in which millions will suffer death through the deprivation of essential food and shelter. During the Great Depression of the 1930s many of the urban homeless and unemployed factory workers found sanctuary on the family farm.
We may now only look back with fond nostalgia at how we lived a couple of generations ago. In hindsight the wisdom of Raw Material Economics proves itself.
As long as we have adequate food and shelter the micro-production of goods and intellectual content can provide for the rest of us. Gone are the days of relying upon those “too big to fail” for our well-being.
The current crop of academically educated economists only argue about how to best preserve the current financial system with all of its structural inequities and invitations for fraud. They are not prepared to consider an egalitarian diverse decentralized distributed economics that possesses intrinsic resilience.
Unfortunately, current administration policies continue the practice of punishing family farmers for the benefit of the financial services industry. Unless you have income from off the farm, you will have to wait until the current economic collapse deepens before re-establishing family farms becomes feasible.
Until then, it promises to be a very bumpy ride and expect to see a great deal of volatility in all markets. Still you have options over the short term and while they exist now would be a good time to explore them.
First, if you now depend upon those “too big to fail” for your income, including all branches of government, the dominant banks and the multinational corporations, now is the time to act on an exit plan. While some employers may be able to restructure their businesses to offer a measure of economic security to employees, these smaller companies will be targeted by government taxmen eager to take away profits and hostile takeovers by predatory corporations.
Second, traditional passive income from investments will become increasingly unreliable and ultimately insufficient as the current economic collapse deepens. You must find a way to become productive while maintaining control over your pricing to be able to respond to deflation, inflation, stagflation and whatever other curve balls the banksters throw.
Of course, a total collapse or even near total collapse will have us all scrambling for food and shelter while those who have stockpiled and continue to hoard will be faced with increasing physical security demands. Police and the armed forces will be the last elements of the status quo to collapse and they will be looking for stockpiled food themselves.
The issue remains of determining what to do between now and a very possible then. Without a doubt having an independent income based upon your own productive capacity will likely become necessary.
While climate change, resource depletion and unsupportable population levels will certainly complicate the issue, realistically there seems very little you or I can do about that. At least if you maintain the capability to produce at parity, that is the sale of your production not only supports your existence but also allows you enough profit to begin another round of production without debt while saving enough to survive unexpected events, then you may have a future.
Maintaining mobility ability is a bonus that could literally become lifesaving. For example, areas of the Oregon coast that once appeared desirable because of the local abundance of seafood are now adjacent to growing oceanic dead zones devoid of any sea life at all.
Expect volatility in all aspects of life. With all of this in mind, an online business seems to be a good bet to me.
If running an online business seems to be beyond your capacity then you owe it to yourself to honestly investigate it because all sorts of people have learned how to run an online business. Now would be a good time to start.






