5 Rules Of Raw Materials Economics
Charles Walters wrote an article for the National Organization for Raw Materials (NORM) in which he stated
The birth of raw material economics — while ancient in origin — has been credited to Benjamin Franklin, the Philadelphia philosopher, printer, and statesman, and to Thomas Jefferson, who as a historian once wrote “invented the United States.”
Although Jefferson gave a published expression to the concept of raw material economics, it was Franklin who sat down the general proposition in concise and understandable terms.
Writing in “Positions to be Examined” concerning national wealth, April 4, 1769, Franklin pointed out that there were three ways in which a nation might become wealthy:
- By war, which permits taking by force the wealth of other nations;
- By trade, which to be profitable requires cheating. For example, if we give and receive an equal amount of goods and services through trade, there’s no profit other than that obtained in our own production cycle.
- By agriculture, through which we plant the seeds and create new wealth as if by a miracle.
All human wealth must originate somewhere in the real world and the process that explains human wealth creation begins with raw materials. Understanding this process which begins with raw materials requires appreciation of the essential role of human productivity.
These 5 Rules Of Raw Materials Economics provide a basic understanding of the process of human wealth creation.
- The amount of raw materials removed from nature becomes humanity’s potential wealth. The potential wealth of the materials determine the number and value of jobs available to produce, transport, process, manufacture, distribute and retail finished products made from these materials.
- The values placed on raw materials determine the amount of money that can be paid for the tools and services used to produce raw materials and controls the price and volume of tools and services purchased by raw materials producers.
- Tools and services purchased by raw materials producers and the tools and services purchased by other people during the same economic cycle becomes the original method of job creation and manifests all the wealth necessary to purchase all finished goods.
- A fair balance between the value placed on raw materials and the value placed on finished goods automatically creates healthy markets and manifests the wealth required to purchase all finished goods.
- The act of production times the fair value of production (AoP x FVoP = wealth), or the proper relationship between production and price, manifests all the wealth necessary for the debt free consumption of all finished goods.
Charles Walters concludes his article with this appreciation of those who compiled the documentation and promoted their findings
Starting in the 1920s and going through the 1960s, several entrepreneurial gentlemen of profound knowledge and inquisitive nature about macro-economics became the “Founding Fathers of Raw Material Economics.” They re-examined the Franklin-Jefferson principles by researching and analyzing the nation’s economic records…
Those “Founding Fathers” were: Charles B. Ray, Carl H. Wilken, Dr. John Lee Coulter and J. Carson Adkerson. They were ably followed by such stalwarts as Arnold “Red” Paulson, Vince Rossiter, Merle Willard, Kermit Couch and others.
Charles Walters could certainly be included among the stalwarts. I would also add Fred Lundgren and Jerome Friemel partially because of their book, The Nature of Wealth.
The essential element of their work seems encapsulated in the concept of Parity, emerging from the analysis of hard economic data and direct observation now stretching over 90 years. Raw materials producers must be paid well enough for them to begin another round of production without acquiring debt.
Parity pricing appears required for a healthy economy.

My goal is to make raw materials economics something that can be understood by all people. I believe an understanding of raw materials economics will open the door to understanding the current circumstances of our shared world.
To help accomplish this goal I encourage and welcome all comments and suggestions, either publicly in the comment section below each article or privately through the contact form.
[Reply]
So glad to have found your site. What to do? How do weget this message out to a larger masses. How come the football leagues can understand “parity” and the farmer can’t or won’t. I worked with Red back in the American Ag Movement Days. Oh if only we could convince the world of this common sense method of economics. Oh yes, I forgot, it might work and people could keep their land and get fair prices at the marketplace. The powers that be will never allow that to happen unless those of left rise up in some kind of unity to bring this awareness to the non farm and eating public. My philosophy has been, who owns the land, controls the people. It’s as simple as that and we are so close to this happening for good now that I don’t know if we can pull it back. We need to try. I am pleading with any dairy farmers out there to work together. We need one national marketing order, we need to insist that these trade agreements foster saving OUR farms and people first. Any ideas. I have been working in this area of Wi and with some of the old line but everyone is just dragging their feet and all the goofy carrots this stupid government dangles in front of us should not pacify those of us left. WE NEED TO TAKE A STAND NOW!
[Reply]
Jay Greathouse Reply:
October 17th, 2009 at 6:06 pm
I feel the greater solution emerges from increased communication and cooperation which builds true democracy independent from authoritarians and their chaos boogey man. Resource producers have the power, always have, but obviously neither the smarts or the will to exercise it.
My faith is in an ignorance that can be met with knowledge. I reject the case of terminal stupidity because then there is no possibility of hope.
Keep on reaching out, there are others but do not expect them to find them geographically close. United States citizens sometimes seem particularly retarded in politics and economics but it is to the benefit of our owners to keep as many as possible angry, fearful, confused and ignorant.
[Reply]